Why political behavior can also be called micropolitics which is essentially the study of the smallest political unit: the individual as a thinker, the belief that what a person does or does Not dictate the future of an organization is an important director when it comes to collectivism affecting political behavior. The challenge is: what happens if one or more individuals fail to progress through education? How does the community advance? Does it advance, does it sit idle, does it last as long as it can sustainably? Education is the key. Without education, without the ability to learn, we remain inactive; our communities will be forced to remain inactive. For example, Nepal, which was just hit by that devastating storm and basically almost destroyed: most of the people moved abroad to get a better education which would then allow them to benefit their land once they returned to house. Nepal is known for agriculture, not doctors, mechanics, etc., so the importance of those who can do things other than agriculture is emphasized. In essence, collectivism is practiced. Because in Nepal the progress of individuals is to the advantage