He doesn't even talk about how exactly the ruler is elected. If we assume that this happens in a democracy, then the ruler will be elected by the majority of votes and not by the general will since the general will of all is not the majority but the will of all. In this case, how can we ensure that people agree one hundred percent on the general will? Most likely, people will not agree with each other on some issues, but since they have to work out a general will to represent everyone, they have to compromise. If individuals do not agree with the general will of others, they will be forced to accept or compromise. Does this go against Rousseau's claim that the general will can never do harm? whoever. How is being forced to agree with something you don't agree with harmful? (Assuming you know what's best for