Begins by showing the four schools: natural scholars, deliberative scholars, protest scholars, and discourse scholars (Dembour 2). They each have their own definition of what they believe human rights mean to them and where they originally developed. Natural scholars are the ones I believe are suited for me to become a part of, while deliberative scholars are the ones I disagree with. Natural scientists use the commonly known definition; rights that one possesses simply by being a human being (Dembour 2). While the Deliberative sees it as “political values ​​that liberal societies choose to adopt” (Dembour 3). It's hard to understand Marie's definition from the words she uses that I've never seen before, which makes it difficult at times to understand what she's trying to convey. Marie has many great examples about Natural Scholars and their beliefs, but no other examples were given or explained more about the other three schools. Although Marie's article is a great read and very detailed, I feel like it is too long for the public to continue reading. The audience would eventually get bored and stop reading halfway through the article. If Marie was able to abbreviate and still provide great detail, overall it would become a great resource to use not only in universities but also in high schools such as