Aristotle uses the word “Eudaimonia” as a term for happiness. He makes some assumptions about how a human soul behaves. It means human flour. It does not mean pleasure or state of mind because he argued that happiness is a form of life. Aristotle divided it into a part that reasons, a part that is guided by reason, and another part that does not respond to reason. He, therefore, implies that there are virtues that will have reason as substance while reason will guide the others as subject. For example, some countries in the Middle East announce to residents that civil war no longer exists. All residents must be happy and start having a new life from now on. In fact, they wouldn't say they will live a happy life. It's just something people wanted for its own sake. Aristotle argues that happiness is not real, but that people desire it only for its own sake. The human being does everything to pursue happiness and believes that it will be completed. He concludes that virtues are habits of the soul with which one acts well for the sake of what is noble or