John O'Sullivan was an influential 19th-century American journalist and publisher, best known for coining the phrase "Manifest Destiny" and advocating the expansion of the United States. In his famous essay “The Great Nation of the Future,” O'Sullivan made a compelling case for the exceptionalism of the United States and its destiny to spread democracy and civilization across the North American continent. In this essay I will analyze O'Sullivan's argument, examining its strengths and weaknesses and considering its relevance in the context of contemporary American society. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Sullivan's argument is rooted in a belief in American exceptionalism, the idea that the United States is a unique and exceptional nation with a special mission in the world. He begins by stating that the United States is “the country of the future,” a nation destined to become the largest and most powerful in the world. O'Sullivan paints a vivid picture of America as a land of opportunity and progress, where individual freedom and democracy thrive, and where people from around the world come seeking a better life. He argues that the United States is a “great nation of the future,” one that is constantly moving and advancing toward a brighter and more prosperous future. One of the strengths of O'Sullivan's argument is its persuasive and optimistic tone. It presents a compelling vision of America as a beacon of hope and progress, a place where the ideals of freedom and democracy are upheld and where people can reach their full potential. This vision of America as a “great nation of the future” resonates with the deeply held beliefs of many Americans, who see their country as a land of opportunity and promise. O'Sullivan's argument taps into this sense of national pride and optimism, making it a powerful and effective rhetorical tool. However, O'Sullivan's argument is not without its weaknesses. One of the main criticisms of his essay is its overtly nationalist and expansionist tone. O'Sullivan's argument for the annexation of Texas and westward expansion of the United States has been widely criticized as an example of American imperialism and colonialism. Critics argue that O'Sullivan's vision of America as a "great nation of the future" is based on the subjugation and displacement of indigenous peoples and the exploitation of natural resources. In this sense, O'Sullivan's argument can be seen as promoting a narrow, exclusivist version of American exceptionalism, which overlooks the darker aspects of American history and the impact of US expansion on marginalized communities. Furthermore, O'Sullivan's argument has been questioned in the context of contemporary American society. In an increasingly diverse and globalized world, the idea of ​​American exceptionalism and the “great nation of the future” has been called into question. Critics argue that O'Sullivan's vision of America as a uniquely virtuous and exceptional nation is outdated and out of touch with the complex reality of modern America. The United States is no longer the world's only superpower, and its role and influence are being challenged by emerging powers and global trends. In this context, O'Sullivan's argument for American exceptionalism may seem overly simplistic and idealistic, failing to take into account the complexities and challenges facing the United States in the 21st century. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom document now come on.