Analytical essay on the War of the Wall“Lou dragged me away because I was about to grab the ladder and shake it.” From the narrator's point of view, he wanted so badly to simply silence her, without even warning her politely at first. After all, he had no right to invade their privacy. But before the narrator could do the wrong thing, Lou saved the painter from embarrassing herself further, which shows more maturity and tolerance in Lou. In the story "The War of the Wall", Lou and the narrator disapproved of the painter at first, "stealing their wall", but eventually discover that she was only trying to honor their society. no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay One day suddenly, the painter came across Lou and the narrator's life, painting their precious wall that held a special place in their hearts. Before this unexpected annoyance arrived, Lou and the narrator never imagined that such a familiar childhood memory could slip through their fingers so easily. Their memories of their role model, Jimmy Lyons, would disappear. Instinctively, Lou and the narrator had to do whatever was necessary to put “their” possession back where it belonged. In their arms. “You're not even from around here,” the narrator shouted at the painter, after noticing her New York license plate. The boys immediately judged her to be an inconsiderate foreigner. Unfortunately, at just the wrong time, the painter asked for food right after refusing fresh food prepared by two innocent girls, wrecking her reputation and making her a liar. To add to this unfortunate chain of events, the painter ate loudly like a pig and kept spotting little “defects” that actually made that culture's food even tastier. At this point, other restaurant customers and the restaurant owner caught fire. But what did she care? After all, all he did was ignore, ignore, ignore. At first the painter was just an irritation, a little fly, capable of being swatted at any moment. But now it was time for the narrator to roll up his sleeves and play dirty, tipping the scales. And that's when Lou put an end to any further problems. This presents the fact that Lou is a follower, a helper, who follows the narrator until there are actually serious consequences. Instead, Lou and the narrator purchased spray paint to damage the painter's completed work. Ironically, this unreasonable tactic was inspired by their elders who despised graffiti. “Dad called it 'graffiti.' Grandma called it a shame. This shows how desperate the kids are to stop her, sacrificing their childhood memories for a feeling of complacency. Now, it wasn't just about protecting their wall; it was also about the ego. Just as Lou and the narrator returned from their purchase, his beautiful, new work of art, the new wall, was unveiled. The kids and other members of the neighborhood peered and gaped at the wall. Mouths agape, paint sliding, Lou and the narrator heard something. It was sympathy, regret and the realization of their misunderstandings. The vibrant “swirls of purple and orange” reminded the Taliaferro Street community of their origins in Africa. Lou and the narrator realized that they didn't need old memories of Jimmy Lyons because there could always be new memories and that they were too quick to judge. Additionally, the vivid illustrations included a small space for the little one's filling dedication.