The movie “My Sister's Keeper” is truly a heartbreaking movie and definitely capable of tugging at anyone's heart strings in a way or in the other, which is probably the director's intention to do so. Being born into the world is in itself a beautiful circumstance; however, being born with the purpose of providing vital organs and substances to a brother overturns the feeling that Anna Fitzgerald had to deal with for much of her childhood. It is understood that Kate, the eldest sister, needs this organ donation from her sister to survive her condition of acute promyelocytic leukemia, a parents' decision. But was it worth risking another child's life in the process? Revolving around this plot, ethical issues emerge from the context of the film which shows the conflicts between one discussion and another in a medical field of opinions. One theme that really came through in the film is definitely the ethical theme of “Quality versus Quantity of Life,” which basically means should you prolong someone's life to keep them alive, even though their life may be horrible or painful? no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay An example of why the “Quality versus Quantity of Life” ethical theme prevails in the film is that Kate Fitzgerald made a promise to Anna that involved Kate dying in the process. Of course there were sibling arguments during this outdoor scene as Kate wanted Anna to stop donating vital organs and other substances such as bone marrow. So, in that scene, the idea of ​​denouncing the parents for the Emancipation Proclamation was really formed. Kate knew that she was dying and that it was very painful for her and the entire family as this cancer condition was tearing the entire family apart, piece by piece, individual by individual. On the other hand, the parents were on the other side of the spectrum, they wanted to prolong Kate's life by any means necessary, Anna's birth as a donor and the constant surgeries, as is directly shown in the film when Anna confronts her mother in the hospital room that she will not donate her kidney, resulting in her mother slapping Anna in the face. “Mother will cut me all up, like a vegetable,” a quote said by Kate that exactly represents the mother's determination to keep her little girl alive, even if the complications are eminent. Another example of why the ethical theme of “Quality versus Quantity” of Life” is prevalent in the film is Kate's physical appearance throughout the film. The symptoms Kate experienced are as follows; Hair loss, nosebleeds, hematemesis, kidney failure, low white blood cell count, to name a few. Of course this is painful for Kate physically and physiologically, but it is also painful for the rest of the family to witness. They try everything they can to preserve Kate's life, but is it really worth it? There is little to no recovery from cancer through a complete recovery and could have lasting effects that could impact the patient's life in various ways. Sure, surgeries seem beneficial in some circumstances for Kate; however, just as Anna gives one thing, Kate needs another, then another, and another. The cycle of giving and needing is endless in this film. Although the film's most harrowing moment occurs at the end, Kate suffers from total cyanosis, poor perfusion of bodily fluids, and many other severe symptoms that can prove life-threatening. Should she just suffer for a prolonged life or should she be medically suspended to be at peace? Keep in mind: this is just.