Social conflict It would have been easy to resolve if one of us wanted to end the bickering. Looking back, it's amazing to me that I acted that way. Again and again the situation crosses my mind, revealing new ends of the discussion. It was a perfect example of similar scenes playing out around the world: the most basic level of social conflict we have, the easiest to resolve. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay I would challenge anyone to speak up if they have not discussed trivial matters with their loved ones and closest friends. These relationships cannot be broken, just as a coast never truly disappears, even if both are subject to terrible pressures. I had been studying for the last three hours and felt the need to refresh myself. I saw my brother was passing by the room and I called and asked him if he could buy me a drink. He shouted back, “Why should I? You take it, you lazy so-and-so. This, for some reason, irritated me quite a bit as I was starting to get frustrated with the difficulty of the study material. I said nothing, but my anger simmered. For the next two days I didn't speak or communicate with my brother, a feat in itself considering we lived in an apartment. I look back and am ashamed of the way I treated my brother. I also look back and, distantly, see myself as a desperate green peace boy trying with one last roll of the dice to save his sanity, throwing his anger at them, those who obviously couldn't see the situation - even if that would be a purpose. entirely too important to imagine. However, as we all know, this is not an isolated incident. Arguments and arguments happen again and again. Much like Kurt Vonnegut's Billy Pilgrim and his daughter, I have an ongoing feud with my brother that flares up from time to time. However, of all the social conflicts we face, this one should be the easiest to resolve. People with whom we share mutual love and trust are willing to resolve conflicts that don't mean much in the long run. This scenario is not repeated everywhere. Social conflicts can occur when neither party can see nor wants to see the solution. Some fights are not based on trivial matters. For example, we have the unresolved battle for black and white supremacy. The situation has not improved in two hundred years, when we can estimate that contact between the two began. Efforts have been made, but conflict between blacks and whites is not something that, I believe, will ever evaporate. It is a deeply rooted cultural conflict. This type of conflict can manifest itself in many ways. We see it every day in America's truly cosmopolitan society: skin color; accent differences and so on. I myself have a lot of first-hand experience with this particular category, as I have been living "abroad" for over nine years. One thing that has haunted me and my family is the fact that Indian cuisine generates a lot of smoke. Thick, hazy smoke that always fills a room, regardless of how long you cook. Cultural conflicts often result in racist slurs in our everyday language. Whether it's the English mocking the silly Irishman - or the French doing the same to a remarkably "Irish" sounding Belgian - these insults can become routine and the conflict can escalate beyond simple remarks and can hurt a person quite deeply. Over time, cultural differences can lead to aggravation on a broader level than a passing comment in a hallway, just as theexamples of the Irish and the Belgians. We all know how feelings of inferiority can lead to insubordination. Like arguments with parents and friends, culture clashes can also lead to better relationships. So as you can see, both the positive and negative aspects of social conflict can coexist. Social commentators have often argued that it would indeed be a boring world in which everyone was white, black, or yellow. However, beyond the facades we display and the differences we harbor, we are essentially all the same. By migrating to different places thousands of years ago, Homo sapiens created what can sometimes actually be “positive” conflict. What if at the end of the First World War there was no one capable of challenging the ideas of the Bolsheviks? Would Europe be entirely communist? The positive effects of social conflict are seen wherever there is a yang capable of challenging another's yin, to use a cliché. There are many times when I face an obstacle in some part of my life. Usually, I overcome this block thanks to the advice of a friend who is not Indian. The difference lies in the mentality. I don't think like an Englishman and this has helped me on many occasions in my life. I'm sure you felt that your friend's suggestion would never reach you in a million years. This is what creates collaborations, innovations. A conflict of ideas is a kind of cauldron, where everyone can throw their newt's paws, to create something that one would not even have imagined. I'm happy to have someone there to conflict with my idea of ​​creating this hybrid entity that adds up to much more than the sum of its parts. In essence, I'm portraying the normal, modern community, with its fair share of conflicts, arguments, and theoretically impossible additions. However, there are incidents where I sometimes wish I lived in India. Having lived in England for eight years, I know more about Christianity than Hinduism. It's a shame. It's a shame because I don't think I'll ever convert to Christianity, yet I don't know enough about my religion to fully practice it or appreciate its ideas. This is a conflict that I deal with alone in my life, but it is a social conflict, one that winds through every nation, city and village. I am by no means alone in my situation. Some people, however, are forced to endure the same situation without any choice of their own or their ancestors. Due to some political clashes, some people of one religion are forced to live in a country where another religion prevails. This is the basic premise of fighting in the Middle East in the past decades since Israel's independence. Today, Islam is one of the most protective religions in the world. Muslims who believe that the book of the Quran is the self-evident truth will under no circumstances accept God or the customs of the Jews. Recently it seemed that a truce in the fighting had been reached. However, it has since emerged that the time was being used as "recovery" time. It is difficult, at least for me, to imagine the end of the fighting any time soon. It seems that people do not want to face a trade-off that can ultimately improve their quality of life. Religion of any kind, of any kind, anywhere has a huge role to play in the role we play in society. Some are so fervent about their ideals that conflict is the only solution. We therefore see that this is a social conflict based on an intrinsic difference that has no foreseeable end. We see that there is something inherent in humans that doesn't allow us to see the bigger goal, the intangible end of it all, or at the very least, how similar religions actually are. The ends, however they arrive, whatever?