A Critical Review of the Film Eye in the Sky first time in 2014 after its filming had started in 2014. Filming began in South Africa and the director focuses on the ethical challenges of drone warfare. The film opens its initial setting in Nairobi, Kenya, where a young girl plays with a hula hoop. As a result, the same morning a British colonel, Katherine Powel, receives news that a British undercover agent based in Kenya has been killed by Al-Shabaab, an Al-Qaeda-linked group with cells in East Africa. Powel takes command of a mission to capture Al-Shabaab leaders who she is told are hiding in a safe house in Nairobi. The Colonel targets Susan Danford and her husband. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayPowell organizes a multinational team for the mission whose members are connected via voice and video systems. An aerial surveillance drone is deployed under the control of Steve Watts based in Nevalda (Hood min. 3). The Kenyan team operates as field agents and is positioned near the shelter to make arrests. A meeting of senior UK government officials and ministers (cobra) oversees the mission. After contacting Farah, a member of the Kenyan team engaged in the mission, Powell discovers that the targeted suspects are planning suicide attacks against civilians. She then asks the cobra and the lawful army to give her “legal authority to strike” (Hood min 9). Previously, the mission aimed to arrest and not kill. Since one of the targets is a US citizen, Cobra does not agree to let Powell bomb the house saying that the action could lead to a diplomatic brawl and put "the nation at risk due to a collateral damage problem" (Hood min 27). As a result, they refer the matter to the UK Foreign Secretary for guidance. The secretary contacts his American counterpart and they agree that the suspects must be eliminated but with caution to minimize collateral damage. In the room where Cobra is talking to Powell, the military personnel discuss the legal and political aspects of their decision. They fear that if they hit the house, Alia, who sells her mother's bread near the targeted building, could cause collateral damage. Powell states that “no one is willing to take the responsibility of pulling the trigger” (Hood 57). Watts and his sensor operator, Carrie Gershon, delay the missile launch hoping Alia will move away from the building. Farah tries to buy all the bread from Alia so that he can move but his headdress is blown away and he runs away leaving the girl to collect the bread to resell. Powell authorizes Watts to strike and the missile wounds Alia while Danford survives. A second shot wounds Alia again and she dies in hospital. In London, commanders discuss the incidence. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Opinion on Drones Based on the film and other reports on the use of drones in the war against terrorism, I agree that drones are allowed in war. My agreement is based on the concept that drones are sometimes accurate. They target a location and hit it with precision. Additionally, before a drone strikes, ground officers undertake investigations that reduce the risk of collateral damage. When risks of collateral damage exist, commanders abort the, 8(5), 5-7.

Topic > A Critical Review of the Film Eye in the Sky first time in 2014 after its filming had started in 2014. Filming began in South Africa and the director focuses on the ethical challenges of drone warfare. The film opens its initial setting in Nairobi, Kenya, where a young girl plays with a hula hoop. As a result, the same morning a British colonel, Katherine Powel, receives news that a British undercover agent based in Kenya has been killed by Al-Shabaab, an Al-Qaeda-linked group with cells in East Africa. Powel takes command of a mission to capture Al-Shabaab leaders who she is told are hiding in a safe house in Nairobi. The Colonel targets Susan Danford and her husband. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayPowell organizes a multinational team for the mission whose members are connected via voice and video systems. An aerial surveillance drone is deployed under the control of Steve Watts based in Nevalda (Hood min. 3). The Kenyan team operates as field agents and is positioned near the shelter to make arrests. A meeting of senior UK government officials and ministers (cobra) oversees the mission. After contacting Farah, a member of the Kenyan team engaged in the mission, Powell discovers that the targeted suspects are planning suicide attacks against civilians. She then asks the cobra and the lawful army to give her “legal authority to strike” (Hood min 9). Previously, the mission aimed to arrest and not kill. Since one of the targets is a US citizen, Cobra does not agree to let Powell bomb the house saying that the action could lead to a diplomatic brawl and put "the nation at risk due to a collateral damage problem" (Hood min 27). As a result, they refer the matter to the UK Foreign Secretary for guidance. The secretary contacts his American counterpart and they agree that the suspects must be eliminated but with caution to minimize collateral damage. In the room where Cobra is talking to Powell, the military personnel discuss the legal and political aspects of their decision. They fear that if they hit the house, Alia, who sells her mother's bread near the targeted building, could cause collateral damage. Powell states that “no one is willing to take the responsibility of pulling the trigger” (Hood 57). Watts and his sensor operator, Carrie Gershon, delay the missile launch hoping Alia will move away from the building. Farah tries to buy all the bread from Alia so that he can move but his headdress is blown away and he runs away leaving the girl to collect the bread to resell. Powell authorizes Watts to strike and the missile wounds Alia while Danford survives. A second shot wounds Alia again and she dies in hospital. In London, commanders discuss the incidence. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Opinion on Drones Based on the film and other reports on the use of drones in the war against terrorism, I agree that drones are allowed in war. My agreement is based on the concept that drones are sometimes accurate. They target a location and hit it with precision. Additionally, before a drone strikes, ground officers undertake investigations that reduce the risk of collateral damage. When risks of collateral damage exist, commanders abort the, 8(5), 5-7.