Picture, your whole family, killed, your city in rubble, nowhere to go, go and seek refuge in any place where protection is given , then you are forced into killing and a life of fighting, when you are rescued, people treat you like a monster and sentence you to prison or even the death penalty, all at a very young age. This is the childhood of many children in places of war, people treat young children forced to commit murder like monsters but in reality they are the victims, I believe child soldiers should be amnestied from crimes unless 2 years of rehab didn't work for many different reasons, many children were initially drugged and desensitized when they seek refuge, faced the tragedy of losing their family and homes, then are forced to face what they did when they were incarcerated . This should not be the consequence of these child soldiers and we should give them another chance at a happy life. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay For starters, many of these children are drugged and their commanders/principal officers (according to an interview by the author of "Child Soldier") Held at gunpoint or left with no choice but to seek refuge in a terrorist camp , many children's brains are not fully developed until the age of 20 and they all do what their emotions tell them and don't think logically, also they just got out of seeing a lot of people killed and don't have the right mindset when they are taken by this terrorist group. This is just the story of a child soldier. My first reason why child soldiers should be given a second chance is that many child soldiers are forced, that means they did not voluntarily join the terrorist group, of course some do, and those who are are in terrible conditions and are really happy it should also be pursued with rehabilitation. Aside from the fact that the children have been forced at gunpoint, manipulated with drugs, with nowhere else to go, and the entire family is dead or missing, where else can they go? The answer is clearly: wherever refuge is offered, unfortunately many of the places where these war-torn children end up are terrorist camps. I believe that in circumstances where children have not recovered after years of rehabilitation they should be dragged. The reason why I believe we should use this method is because it gives drug-addicted children a chance to prove that it was not their fault, but that of their principal officers and whatever else they were forced to take (drugs, forced use), he threatened ETC). My second reason is that they had come out of a tragedy and other problems, for example many children had just seen family and friends being massacred, also they were wandering around their city and must have been very dehydrated and hungry, these factors play a role huge in decision making in the brain, speaking of the brain, young children's brains are not fully developed until they are in their early 20s, it may not seem important, but the last part of the brain to develop is the frontal lobe (the part responsible for decision making), this means that these children run away from their emotions, as if they were alone they were looking for help where they can find it. You see, they track down people whose brains were not fully developed at the time the crimes were committed. Some people might say child soldiers who knew what they were getting into.