Topic > Overview of the problem of cancel culture in the contemporary world

The eggshell generation or snowflake generation is a harsh term that describes the fundamental problem of our society today. The reason? Simple, this generation will have to walk on eggshells for whatever we do or say. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Cancel culture is a complicated and layered topic that boils down to the belief that people accused of engaging in bad behavior are “canceled” and subsequently erased from the media. Social media is the fuel for the burning match of this culture. What took several years for movements to institute progressive change can now happen to any unfortunate person who might have made a stupid joke online before taking a plane and become jobless before landing. Cancel culture is what can be described as mob justice carried out by individuals to gain respect, calling out people they have listed as adversaries to demonstrate their good character or moral correctness. And like so many positive movements, what a shame that it was initially a promising movement. However, what happens is that individuals who do not aimlessly obey a specific standard are attacked by participants for being “offensive” and “disrespectful.” It is the ugly side of today's society, where more often than not the persecution of innocent people falls on those who refuse to accept what society deems/considers politically "correct" in an attempt to give occasion to their scruples and cast them on society. their "utopian" vision. At least to me, it seems like a situation where people override and reshape old words and actions to suit their own purposes. The problem I have is that they not only prosecute criminals or extremists, but they misuse and abuse these terms to suit their purposes. Now I'm all for holding people accountable for their words, but we've gotten to a point where people deliberately bring up things from someone's past to attack them or otherwise stir up controversy. A good example of this is James Gun, an award-winning director who has worked on many beloved and successful film franchises such as Scooby-Doo, Avengers and his most famous work: Guardians of the Galaxy. Previous Twitter posts he wrote came to light after journalists mulled them over and made them public, which left him worried about making some dark and distasteful jokes. This, however, was enough of an outcry for social justice warriors to pressure Disney into firing and canceling one of his biggest career contracts, as well as being removed from Disney. But you might think it's plausible that someone would be held accountable, but an important point to note is that these inappropriate tweets that surfaced were decades old. He was “canceled” for his nasty tweets made from 2010 to 2014. He posts shame and ridicule as cancel culture hinders compromise, reconciliation and forgiveness. Mistakes are what cause people, abusing this cultural medium for minor errors, to fail to encourage empathy. It is important as an individual to resist what comprises an angry mob mentality and to remain sane. By one standard, society is entering a gradual downward spiral of valuing what looks good over what works. When people fail to pursue viable solutions for fear of being disapproved (cancelled), it reflectsan unhealthy influence of the mainstream where people avoid topics that might otherwise be "controversial". An example includes “obesity,” a topic that most people tend to avoid; where one side supports diversity and body acceptance, the other side quietly claims to glorify obesity which promotes dangerous health consequences. Calling people out is justified to troublemakers seeking to do harm, but recognizing the difference between a flirtatious person and a predator is something the media blows out of proportion. One factor that contributes to this is what news stories or titles. The narrative of the situation and the narrator is usually not objective by default and seemingly only provides selective details that fit their narrative. Thus adding fuel to the fire. A 2018 study found that only 51% of Australian news consumers "understood that the ABC is advertising-free and funded by taxpayers". This suggests that consumers are likely to be exposed to misinformation or news that may have little journalistic or political value, but which therefore escalates a "purge" of which they are not truly up to date. This leads to the fact that most people are quick to judge without knowing the situation or being informed of certain details. This is what makes cancel culture toxic, imagine you have an accidental mistake and suddenly you wake up to find thousands or millions of people calling you out and bashing you, regardless of your views or past achievements. Social media has exacerbated the standard that people can safely and easily jump on the erasure bandwagon and be more cruel under the guise of anonymity on the Internet. After all, under the protection of the collective pack there is no sense of personal identity. Frankly, situations like this happen all the time; In 2016, Johnny Depp, Amber Heard's alleged abuser, fell from grace when a wave of people rushed to "cancel" him after his wife accused Johhny of domestic abuse. Rushing and jumping to conclusions, people began to "write him off" resulting in serious financial losses, abandonment of the main role in a film series and a bad state of mind. When in reality; the audio of Amber Heard's confession proved otherwise. Johnny was indeed the true victim of the abusive relationship, but he was callously mocked and maliciously condemned. This is proof that we, as a collective, must realize the need to develop more critical empathic thinking skills. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Culture-cancelling overgeneralization is also harmful is misaligned: its effects are beneficial but it somehow hinders us in another. As technology has made physical life easier, quality of life has been prioritized and our goal of being a fulfilled society means that we have developed opposition and dissent towards that which causes us emotional distress, hence the creation of the culture of 'annulment. Little by little we continue to build a broader list of what is acceptable and, of course, this means we become more sensitive. Cancel culture's ability to potentially create a positive window of opportunity is significant, however, having a group of self-appointed moral guardians decide what and who is acceptable is unreliable and troubling. If nothing else, history and past events have shown us that we get poor results when we trust people to make judgments./