-complexity. They also argue that when a person generally sees himself as a good person, regardless of his reactions, he tends to think of himself as a good person and this is known as a self-schema. Ginovich supports these claims by further clarifying that the complexity of the self is much more complex than the concept of the self. He believes that people have different ways they think or believe themselves to be. It provides an example where a person can have different traits and the complex is what comprises the person's behavior. Traits are the self-concept while behavior is the complexity of the self. He also gives the example of a woman. He states that a woman can be a mother, girlfriend of a daughter. In this case he clarifies that the woman represents the complexity of the self while the daughter, wife and girlfriend represent the concept of the self. In other words, self-complexity consists of an individual's different self-concepts. Self-awareness vs. self-awareness Ginovich explains that self-awareness involves an individual's ability to fix their attention on the concept of the self. If a person is able to do this, then that particular individual is said to have self-awareness. Self-awareness is the ability to embrace self-awareness in the public context. It provides an example that children are honest because they are aware of themselves and that their self-concept motivates them to always tell the truth. Therefore, their self-awareness is due to their self-awareness and their self-concept. Sedikides and Spencer (2014), however, think differently. They believe that self-awareness is where an individual knows what they want despite the factors or circumstances surrounding them. On the other hand, self-awareness is where an individual knows where he is aware of his current state and what he should not do. In other words, the two have no close relationship to Ginovich's self-concept. Therefore, they believe that there is no close relationship between self-awareness and self-awareness. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Conclusion Based on the illustrations above, it is quite clear that the topic of self-concept is very broad and debatable. Gilovich and his colleagues conscientiously explained their ideas and opinions on the concept of the self. From the above discussions, it can be seen that Gilovich presented his ideas very well using supported evidence to support his claims. On the other hand, Sedikides and Spencer (2014) think differently but at some point they agree together. They all agree that the self-concept in humans is built over time as the individual grows, but they also disagree on whether or not some animals manifest the idea of the self-concept. However, based on the above discussions, it can be concluded that Ginovich was more accurate with his findings and with the whole perspectival idea of the self-concept than Sedikides and Spencer. This can be attributed to the fact that he provided clear explanations and concrete evidence to support his claims.

Topic > -complexity. They also argue that when a person generally sees himself as a good person, regardless of his reactions, he tends to think of himself as a good person and this is known as a self-schema. Ginovich supports these claims by further clarifying that the complexity of the self is much more complex than the concept of the self. He believes that people have different ways they think or believe themselves to be. It provides an example where a person can have different traits and the complex is what comprises the person's behavior. Traits are the self-concept while behavior is the complexity of the self. He also gives the example of a woman. He states that a woman can be a mother, girlfriend of a daughter. In this case he clarifies that the woman represents the complexity of the self while the daughter, wife and girlfriend represent the concept of the self. In other words, self-complexity consists of an individual's different self-concepts. Self-awareness vs. self-awareness Ginovich explains that self-awareness involves an individual's ability to fix their attention on the concept of the self. If a person is able to do this, then that particular individual is said to have self-awareness. Self-awareness is the ability to embrace self-awareness in the public context. It provides an example that children are honest because they are aware of themselves and that their self-concept motivates them to always tell the truth. Therefore, their self-awareness is due to their self-awareness and their self-concept. Sedikides and Spencer (2014), however, think differently. They believe that self-awareness is where an individual knows what they want despite the factors or circumstances surrounding them. On the other hand, self-awareness is where an individual knows where he is aware of his current state and what he should not do. In other words, the two have no close relationship to Ginovich's self-concept. Therefore, they believe that there is no close relationship between self-awareness and self-awareness. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Conclusion Based on the illustrations above, it is quite clear that the topic of self-concept is very broad and debatable. Gilovich and his colleagues conscientiously explained their ideas and opinions on the concept of the self. From the above discussions, it can be seen that Gilovich presented his ideas very well using supported evidence to support his claims. On the other hand, Sedikides and Spencer (2014) think differently but at some point they agree together. They all agree that the self-concept in humans is built over time as the individual grows, but they also disagree on whether or not some animals manifest the idea of the self-concept. However, based on the above discussions, it can be concluded that Ginovich was more accurate with his findings and with the whole perspectival idea of the self-concept than Sedikides and Spencer. This can be attributed to the fact that he provided clear explanations and concrete evidence to support his claims.