Index IntroductionImportance of the researchCritique of the articleConclusionIntroductionInternational speculation is ripe regarding the secrecy and high censorship of interweb expression in China. The seminal paper by King et al. (2013) explores the researcher's creation and testing of a central hypothesis that explores the purpose of China's censorship program and how it impacts the country's political activities. Researchers (King et al., 2013) believe that the Chinese government censors all posts with potential for collective action, particularly during periods of rapid high-volume momentum on “trending” topics. It also hypothesizes that, contrary to other research, the theory of state criticism is not of concern to the Chinese government. King et al., (2013) collected meticulous social media data to monitor human expression using automated engineering software. This allowed the researchers to analyze and examine the censoring patterns, which came back positive in favor of their initial hypothesis. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay Furthermore, King et al., (2013) conclude that the Chinese leadership welcomes free expression on social media, regardless of their positive or negative arguments. The leadership sees social media as a platform to obtain the people's views on government decisions (Xiao, 2011). With great support from further research, King et al., (2013) state that the government has recognized that a bad reputation does not threaten their hold on government power, as long as censors continue to eliminate conversations that have the potential for action collective. As King et al. actually state, “The Chinese are individually free but collectively in chains.” Significance of Research Due to the decentralization of social media in China, as well as the size and efficiency of their censorship program, there is immense international curiosity. . Researchers (King et al., 2013) focused on a topic that desperately needed analysis and critique. Previous studies of Chinese censorship are effective when focusing on political science, but they generally rely on personal accounts of government officials, public opinion polls, and government-released statistics. King et al., (2013) correctly state that this denotes the validity of the research and deems it unreliable. By revealing patterns of censorship, researchers effectively reveal the government's intentions. Critique of the Article The piece by King et al., (2013) is structured effectively with subheadings, images and data graphs, allowing the reader to effectively follow the content. This is essential as it ensures logical understanding of each section. Similarly, researchers also follow a concise, well-structured and focused research method. Due to the sheer mass of publicly available social media content, a random sampling strategy would have produced invalid results (Esarey and Xiao, 2011). That's why their stratified sampling strategy, organizing posts into categories of political sensitivity, is effective. Using an automated system, the researchers were able to obtain social media posts before the Chinese manually censored them. Similar results were discovered by Guo and Feng (2012) in their study on Chinese Internet censorship. They reveal that despite the high level of expertise demonstrated by censors, there is a window of opportunity before controversial posts are removed. King et al., (2013) sufficiently test the central hypothesis since the method of.