Within Remains, Simon Armitage, known for focusing on physiological health and creating a documentary about a young soldier in the midst of the conflict in Afghanistan, presents the theme of suffering through the personal vision of a young regimented soldier, sharing a scene that had clearly left an abyss of guilt and had caused physiological health problems such as post traumatic stress disorder. This is because the man who "and someone else and someone else" shot a man who was breaking into a bank, but he was "maybe armed, maybe not", which aroused uncertainty in the soldier's mind, filling him with meaning of guilt. they shot an innocent man. In comparison, Carol Ann Duffy, social critic and holder of the title of Poet Laureate, conveyed suffering by focusing on the memories and flashbacks that a photographer experienced while developing “in his darkroom” his photos that he had taken during the wars. The war photographer clearly makes an expert attempt to detach himself from the “hundred black and white sufferings” in order to focus on the job at hand as a desperate coping mechanism, yet a certain memory makes its way into his mind. she lies as she remembers "the cries of this man's wife" and connects to a very important moment for the woman: the death of her husband. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essaySymbolism is used by Simon Armitage in Remains to describe the way in which "this looter" haunted the soldier's memory and appeared everywhere, effectively ensuring that the young soldier could not even pass "the bank doors" without entering in a living flashback. The soldier's memories of the bank seem to represent the bank of a bursting river, where the overwhelming current of his memories is too strong to be compressed at the sight of the bank he visits regularly for personal use because his immense war experiences have affected so much his mind so that anything bearing the slightest resemblance to his regimented past will bring back memories. The former soldier appears to be suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder after a terrible incident that left him wondering if he had killed an innocent man with "someone else and someone else", or if the soldiers had been right and killed someone who was potentially about to do harm. many people. Repetition is also used earlier in the poem to describe how there is no escape from the self-condemnation that the looter was “probably armed, maybe not.” Since the soldier can't even sleep without this man's nightmares, this has led him to resort to self-medicating with "drinks and [drugs]" and even that, however, won't "flush" him out. The mere fact that he uses “alcohol and [drugs]” proves that the man is no longer in the army, whether he left on his own initiative or not, soldiers would have been regularly examined for these things, even if They were not tested for mental health issues and therefore did not receive any help on this item. The alliteration used also indicates a lack of support received because he would need to speak to a therapist about his mental health issues, although 0.4% of military money is allocated to soldiers' mental health, making it unlikely that his illness would be noticed . The way the soldier describes the "[looter]" as alive indicates that he lives on in his memory. Furthermore, the metaphor that Armitage uses to state how the dead man appears everywhere without exception conveys the idea that both the looter and the speaker werevictims, albeit for different reasons. Because the man is "in [the soldier's] mind when [he closes] his eyes", it gives the impression that mental health problems almost become something that is absolutely inescapable. Colloquial language is also used by the soldier to describe how the soldier felt about the shooting, feeling like the victim's "bloody life" ended because of his "bloody hands." The adjective “bloody” used to describe the deceased's life implies that the young man felt solely responsible for “[snatching] [the looter's] life” and killing him. The pain he feels is reflected in his mental health problems, another of which may be obsessive compulsive disorder. The soldier could literally imagine the man's blood on his hands again and having his own hands bloodied because he had washed them so much that the skin was torn off. A living scar is something his mental illnesses could be seen as, almost as if it were imprinted on his skin that he killed this man. The pain that runs through the soldier's body forces him to constantly wonder if he is not a murderer, which is why the repetition of the adjective “bloody” is used. The idea of ​​monotony and repetition causes thoughts that mean the speaker relives the event “again” and “again” and “again”. This adverb indicates that there is no escape from the thoughts and by naming the dead man simply as a "looter", it implies that the soldier's thoughts cannot be silenced because this man is identified and anonymous, meaning he cannot visit his grave or apologize, which only brings out more regrets. The dead man was "left for dead in some distant, sunny, sand-choked land or six feet under desert sand," which offered no peace to the speaker because he couldn't even be sure that the man who had had been killed they even had a dignified burial. The sibilance creates an effect that draws attention to the quote, implying ideas of discontent and non-closure, meaning that the dead man will forever haunt his mind and cause health problems because he cannot be “[stated] out". contrasts with the “half-formed ghost” that “[begins] to writhe” before the subject's eyes in Carol Ann Duffy's War Photographer, because although the metaphor contains no detail in the “traits of the stranger” (conveying ideas of anonymity and death resembling the hundreds of others the photographer has witnessed), the permanent stain of life that remains from the "blood stained with foreign dust" allows the photographer to revisit the innocent man's deathbed if he looked hard enough and wanted to. However, although the photographer was able to visit the place where the incident occurred, he left because it happened elsewhere, even though the memories were things he could not leave in the foreign country, along with the mental scars of the war. The metaphor also implies that the innocent man's blood was literally soaked into the ruined ground like an immovable tattoo of life. Duffy also uses sibilance, symbolism, and juxtaposition to describe how the spools of photographs transform into “spools of suffering [are] fixed in orderly rows.” The rows suggest a clear military connection, representing the “orderly rows” to which soldiers they would refer to in the army, which is symbolic as it serves as a form of order within fields of chaos. A cemetery could also be interpreted as “orderly rows”, symbolizing the enormous loss of life and happiness that is occurs during the war. The hiss in the powerful phrase "coils of suffering" validates the idea of ​​loss of life and its rows and rows show the small.