The SelfAs we have learned in previous weeks, there are two views of the self. The view of the avocado and the view of the artichoke. As we all know, avocado is a pear-shaped fruit with a rough, leathery skin, smooth, oily, edible pulp and a large stone. It is also referred to as the evergreen tropical tree that bears the avocado. It is native to Central America and widely cultivated elsewhere. Now that we understand how to make avocado, what about the artichoke? An artichoke is a tall, thistle-like composite plant, cynara scolymus, native to the Mediterranean region, of which the numerous branch-like scales and immature flower head receptacle are eaten as a vegetable. How can these two plants be an idea of ​​itself? Did you know that if you plant an avocado seed, it can grow a completely new avocado plant? And once the plant is fully grown, it has the ability to produce a whole new generation of avocados. Some philosophers argue that human beings have an essential nature. But what does this have to do with avocado? In an avocado, the seed is the center that contains all the essential information about what makes an avocado an avocado. As in humans, the essential part of man, the part that makes us more human than animal is the avocado seed. The essential nature of human beings is to believe that they are God. But how can we determine whether human beings have an essential nature? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Well, it's pretty simple. Since we know that the essential nature is God and reason, how are we all connected through God? If you believe in God or read the Bible there is a verse that says “Let us make man in our image” we are all in the image of God the Father and God the Mother. And how are we all connected through reason? Well, in this topic we have critical thinking and Socrates. Socrates wondered what the purpose of life was? Many people have an answer to this question and they are all different. But all human beings have the mind of a kitten, what I mean is that we are always looking for answers somewhere. But what is the artichoke's idea of ​​himself? Well, some philosophers disagree that human beings have an essential nature. The artichoke has a soft layer that can be peeled off one by one. And when the last layer disappears there is nothing left? Why? Well, that's because the "heart" of the artichoke is actually the base of the flower. However, the heart does not contain the essence of the artichoke. In short, the artichoke is nothing more than a mass of layers. No part of an artichoke can produce another generation of artichokes. The artichoke vision states that we are capable of rational deduction and communication. But he's also saying that people don't share the same fundamental logic. According to the artichoke view, we are determined by our actions and not by God or the universe. According to the artichoke's vision, our commitment to the environment makes us who we are. How are the vision of the artichoke and the vision of the avocado connected? Well, I know how different they are. As stated previously, from the avocado's perspective there is a core or essence that does not change after peeling the outer skin. This inner essence is not changed by life experiences, no matter how great or traumatic. This is because it is believed to be what defines human nature. This inner essence is considered the soul. So the artichoke view says that humans have no core, essential nature, and that our actions and experiences define who we are. However, thanks to the power given to human beings, it is possible to manage the situation and develop a character that does not changedespite life's challenges. This is what gives the artichoke at least some resemblance to the avocado. Art and Philosophy So, now that we've discussed the artichoke and avocado vision, what is art? What does art have to do with philosophy? How does it help you discern what is truth and what is not? And who captures the modern/avocado idea that we have essential, shared human nature and that the self and the world are distinct entities? Philosophers approached the topic of what is considered beautiful or artistic-aesthetic in the same way they approached morality. Some have attempted to define the properties of beauty and art, while others have suggested that the appreciation of these qualities depends on culture or is simply a matter of taste. Socrates once asked “what is beauty?” Do you think he was looking for the actual definition? No, he was trying to see if there is some specific property that makes something beautiful. Is there something that makes all things beautiful? That's the question he was actually asking himself. Plato argued that there is such a thing as ideal beauty, that it exists in an ideal world of perfect forms. But some philosophers say we define beauty based on our experiences and cultures. So why do people have very different opinions on beauty? Some believe that beauty is not an intrinsic quality of things; rather, it is “in the eye of the beholder.” This means that beauty is a matter of opinion. So, once again, how is the art related to the vision of the avocado? Well, the avocado vision says that we all have an essential nature. In the previous paragraphs I just stated that Plato argued that there is such a thing as ideal beauty, that it exists in an ideal world. This means that we would all have the same thoughts about art and beauty. But how does it relate to the vision of the artichoke? The artichoke vision says that we are determined by our actions and experiences. Some philosophers believe that we define beauty based on our experiences and cultures. So why do people have very different opinions on beauty? Some believe that beauty is not an intrinsic quality of things; rather, it is “in the eye of the beholder.” This means that beauty is a matter of opinion. Sounds like the avocado's vision of the self, right? So the final question for this section of the paper is Who captures the modern/avocado idea that we have an essential, shared human nature and that the self and the world are distinct entities? I don't think anyone in particular has managed to capture the vision of the avocado. From what I understand, Kant and Schelling definitely supported the artichoke view. But I have overlooked or discredited the avocado point of view, solely in my opinion. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Truth and Reality What is truth? here are four truths in philosophy. But what is truth? Well, empiricists believe that truth has something called empirical warrant, which is consistent with the correspondence theory of truth and is based on the assumption that there is an objectively present world of facts that exists beyond our perception of it. They basically believe he has a statement or they believe he made it true. But even if a belief is not justified, it is not false. Empiricists, like most people, need evidence for a belief to be true. They need to see it to believe it. I imagine that these individuals do not believe in God. For example, if I say that the house is on fire but there is no smoke in the room, the claim has no empirical warrant. However, if I say the house is on fire and there is black smoke in all the rooms,.