More often than not, humans are required to take care of each other in times of crisis. However, this role changes on an individual level where some believe this should not be called a responsibility but an act of will. This leads to conflict between individuals and society. Society, for its part, considers things like inequality, justice and morality as some of the most critical aspects that humans should feel towards, against the individual view that sees them as a personal decision. Despite the numerous counterarguments that have been made against justice, morality, and equality, we should learn that each of them applies to every individual in the world, regardless of whether they believe in them or not. This leaves everyone wondering: should justice, morality and equality be a way of life for every individual and society? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The world is currently full of shouts with every person shouting against poverty. Many people have been affected by the catastrophe, and this calls for help from every corner of the world to defend humanity. Martha Nussbaum in her writings recognizes poverty as something that needs the attention of everyone in the world. He recognizes that many disciplines around the world have focused heavily on assessing poverty and how to end it (Martha, p99). He argues that the situation carries enough weight that it should be recognized and studied in many other disciplines such as philosophy, which require reasoning and critical thinking about the best path forward. This is where the paradigm of the capabilities approach comes into play to evaluate human development. Poverty has been recognized as one of the commonly discussed topics that tends to question social justice in the world. Considering the gap that exists between rich and poor, many governments have focused so much on national economic growth, neglecting the reality of lives lived by real people (Martha, p99). In this way, victims of social injustice have spread across the world to areas such as East Bengal due to the lack of basic necessities such as medical care, food and shelter (Peter, p229). As if human life does not matter, many rich nations like the UK are seen to have injected large amounts of funds into infrastructure development while countries like China suffer from poverty. This implies that such developed nations value their economic and infrastructural development more than the lives of the many refugees in camps who suffer from a lack of basic needs. (Peter, p230). With all this in hand, the question of whether human beings are truly fair to each other has continued to persist in the minds of many people and especially in those of various philosophers and writers who have always tried to bridge the gap between different ideas about how human beings should treat each other in terms of justice, morality, and how to inflict equality on all human beings. The diversities that exist in human life should be studied and common ground is created to create the most favorable world for human beings to live in. The basic ideas of justice should be spread globally as the implementation of justice needs a global approach. broader perspective (Martha, p99). Justice and morality are always intertwined. To be just, a certain degree of morality is always necessary. It would be wise for every human being to always prevent bad things from happening as the occurrence of such would always affect other human beings. Would betherefore it is unfair and immoral to sit back and watch while others suffer from problems that we could have prevented. This requires us to prevent what is bad without necessarily promoting what is good and without sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance (Peter, p231). However, this requires that we be self-sufficient and live a life without depending on the help of others (Emerson and Ralph, p90). The extent to which one should strive to do good things has no limits. The government is even being asked to change policies to ensure that the lives of real people are protected. The government's broader perspective to address the economic crisis and subject the value of life to figures and tables is not the right path. Issues such as GDP should be evaluated from a different perspective than that in which human life is evaluated. Rather, real stories of real people like Vasanti should be taken into consideration which allow for the evaluation of existing problems thus enabling sustainable and efficient solutions to the problems to be found (Martha, p100). Evaluating problems and finding solutions is a good way to explain moral justice. For example, observers, experts and supervisors sent to fight famine by humanitarian organizations can lay the foundation on which so many famine-stricken people in all geographic areas of the world rely. It does not matter which part was affected by the catastrophe as the importance of human life is universally critical. It would, therefore, be immoral and unjust to discriminate against people on geographical grounds (Peter p232). However, there are theories that define people as a human resource, which is a strange antithesis to the capabilities approach. The capabilities approach is involved in the comparative assessment of quality of life where basic social justices are theorized (Martha, p100). This evaluates what each person in a society can do or be and the opportunities available to each person (Martha, p100). Most people in the world have various opportunities and resources to improve the well-being of others in the world. For example, most people, instead of buying clothes to keep warm, tend to buy clothes to look good. The money used to purchase such clothes could be used to assist other human beings suffering in different parts of the world, such as refugees in Bengali. This can also be compared to an individual who is undecided whether to dive into a capsule to save a drowning child only because there are other people at the same distance as him and also because there is a possibility of his clothes getting muddy and wet. on the water. process. Saving a life in such a case is much more important than waiting for others to do so, as most of those who would be present in such a case would be reluctant to do so. The element of reluctance makes the moral obligations of every human being questionable. Another opportunity that each of us has is to part with a few coins that would be miscellaneous compared to the ones we have. These few dollars can then be used to provide for the needs of people suffering in other parts of the world without the ability to help themselves. As long as the organizations receiving these funds are not private, people and governments should view helping others as their responsibility. The question of duty and charity has always been confusing. People aren't always able to understand when they should give to charity and when they should take it as a responsibility. The confusion was caused by the disruption of traditional moral categories. (Peter, p235). This is because the.