For example, Watson provides a concept that requires further confirmation: “It will take seventy-five years, or for me almost 100, before women can expect to be paid the same as men for the same work” (2), there was no indication that his hypothesis constituted a good comparison testable using empirical evidence (Logos), and there are no details on the connection between the standards of two or more variables. As a result, this has diminished Watson's credibility with the public, which will lead to further scrutiny of his argument and whether he should have the right to deliberate on gender inequality. Furthermore, Watson does not take into account the physical, mental and natural abilities of men and women, which obviously indicates that he needs to conduct further investigation into his theory. Finally, Watson should offer more evidence in his claim, rather than attempting to make the audience feel particular emotions, which does not meet the requirements of logical reasoning.